Source article / ARCHIVE REVIEW COPY
Higher Ultra-Processed Food Intake Linked to Silent Brain Damage on MRI
Preserved from the supplied Arising archive. Scientific claims and citations have not been independently checked for this website update. This is a draft for invited review, not a published episode or clinical guidance.
THE ARISING · LONGEVITY & HEALTHSPAN SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2026
IN THIS EDITION · LONGEVITY & HEALTHSPAN
1 ACOG Now Recommends Hormone Therapy for Many Women With Hot Flashes
2 Cardiologists Urge Doctors to Prescribe Exercise as Routine Heart Care
3 Fasting and Autophagy in Humans: Summary Calls Link Unproven
4 Gut Supplements May Modestly Improve Cognition in Adults Over 60, Review
Finds
5 Higher Ultra-Processed Food Intake Linked to Silent Brain Damage on MRI
6 Higher VO2 Max Linked to Lower Depression and Anxiety Risk in UK Biobank
7 Bonn Lab Study Shows Blood Cells From Older Donors Lose Epigenetic Age in a
Dish
8 Longer Sleep Linked to Kidney Disease Risk in Type 2 Diabetes
LONGEVITY & HEALTHSPAN · WEEKLY READ · 2 MIN JAMA NETWORK OPEN · 2 SOURCES
Higher Ultra-Processed Food Intake
Linked to Silent Brain Damage on MRI
Middle-aged adults who ate the most ultra-processed food were more
likely to show small, symptom-free signs of blood vessel injury in the
brain on MRI, according to a study in JAMA Network Open, yet they
did not score worse on two common thinking tests.
his is an observational, cross-sectional study. It included 8,783 Canadian
adults aged 35 to 69 with no cardiovascular disease. Their average age wasT
57.7 years, and 4,917 (56.6%) were women. Because diet and health were
looked at together, the study can show an association. It cannot show that the food
caused the brain changes.
Participants came from two Canadian research projects, the Canadian Alliance for
Healthy Hearts and Healthy Minds and the Prospective Urban and Rural
Epidemiology-MIND study. Intake of ultra-processed food was measured with food
frequency questionnaires that have been validated before. Results were expressed as
servings per 2,000 calories a day. The researchers compared the highest quarter of
eaters with the lowest quarter.
THE ARISING · OCTOBER 18, 2026 PAGE 14
The brain finding is the headline. The study defined vascular brain injury as either
covert brain infarcts or high white matter hyperintensities. Covert infarcts are small
areas of damage from interrupted blood flow that cause no obvious symptoms.
White matter hyperintensities are bright spots on MRI in the brain's wiring. The
highest quarter of ultra-processed food intake had higher odds of this injury than the
lowest quarter (adjusted odds ratio 1.40; 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.77; P for
trend = .009). An odds ratio is not the same as a 40% higher chance of damage, but it
points in the same direction.
The highest-intake group also carried more body fat. Body fat percentage was 1.7
percentage points higher, and visceral fat volume, the fat deep in the abdomen, was
5.7 mL greater. Liver fat did not differ significantly.
Thinking performance did not follow the same pattern. The study found no
significant associations between ultra-processed food intake and scores on the
Montreal Cognitive Assessment or the Digital Symbol Substitution Test. The authors
also say the link with brain injury was sensitive to how ultra-processed food was
defined. That suggests the result depends on the measuring method and should be
read with some caution.
Many readers will want to know what this means for women. The abstract reports
results for the whole group and does not break them out by sex, so this article cannot
say whether the link is stronger in women. The study did include more women than
men.
The result adds to, but is not the same as, our October 11 report on a randomized
trial in Nature Metabolism. That trial looked at how single meals affect the body.
This study looks at usual eating habits and brain scans in thousands of people.
Together they point to ultra-processed food as worth watching, but neither shows
that cutting it back protects the brain. That has not been tested here.
WHAT TO WATCH NEXT
The authors say longitudinal studies, which follow people over time, are
needed to establish whether the diet comes before the brain changes.
Sources: JAMA Network Open (2026), Medical Xpress (reporting on JAMA Network Open, McMaster
University)
THE ARISING · OCTOBER 18, 2026 PAGE 15
Source: AR-20261018-D-005 · 2026-10-18 · ORIGINAL_NEWSLETTER
Back to the media library →